News Detail

3D Printing of Food: Boon or Bane?

* Photo credit: copyright of Chloe Rutzerveld and the Edible Growth Project.

President Obama recently praised 3 Printing technologies which have been used to make everything from guitars, to guns to living tissue and heart valves. Naturally, it was only a matter of time before someone extended the technology to gourmet foods. Enter Chloe Rutzerveld on the scene. Chloe is a freelance food designer who graduated from the Eindhoven University of Technology, Holland. She has been working on the Edible Growth Project.

Says Chloe: “The intention of this project is to show that gourmet food can be grown in a lab. Such high tech food need not be unhealthy nor unpalatable. Edible Growth has produced delicious, natural, nutritious and most importantly sustainable food. The process uses natural phenomenon like fermentation and photosynthesis. We believe this technology can help overcome our dependence on natural resources and even help overcome world hunger.

Here is our take on 3D printed lab grown food:


  1. You can get personalized food in the form of texture, ingredients, flavors, shapes and color.
  2. You can create tasty nutritious food from sources like Algae, beet leaf, insects, grass and lupine seeds.
  3. You can conveniently print the food fresh and with innovative textures, flavors and shapes using natural processes.
  4. Innovative shapes, textures etc gives you freedom to produce and develop new dishes, and new concepts.
  5. 3D printing promotes sustainability. One can print only what is needed avoiding printing of excess or unsold food. Could be a long term solution to end World Hunger.
  6. Currently the technology is still new. So, printing food is a slow process. Mass production of food could take several hours, weeks, days or months.
  7. Even if speeds increase, other factors like how fast the plastic/ingredients used harden will vary on the materials being used.
  8. If you want something twice as big as what is available currently, the cost would also likely be 3-4 times higher.
  9. Most 3-D printers can work with only one material at a time.
  10. Energy used by the 3D printers is high. Depending on what is being printed, the electricity usage can be 100 times higher than conventional printing.
  11. There may be many other environmental impacts we would know about until the technology has been thoroughly evaluated and tested well.
  12. Cleaning and other maintenance of the printers may be difficult.
  13. Home users of the printers will also need to be trained in using the printer first.
  14. All said and done, it still feels we are going against nature and Mother Earth. There may be rippling effects one is not aware of until much later.


Love it or hate it? Let us know in comments below!

4 Comment

  • Whatever makes one think that this actually is truly healthy for you..processed products, no doubt with preservatives, hidden ingredients and possibly chemicals… .
    Might appear to be a great solution, but most things that mess with nature have a way of coming right back at one; chemical farming & GMO’s (Monsanto for example), bleaching foods etc. people can have great imaginations, but that doesn’t mean every invention will work. Think this may be a step too far. If we learned to work with the land properly this would be unnecessary. There are some places where desert has been reclaimed.. And where companion planting yields insect free produce. We could possibly focus efforts on this instead of making false report food than is already pumped out by chain eateries. I hope whoever wants to drive this idea gets beamed back to Earth by Scottie soon…

  • I have been waiting for (Star Trek) replicators forever! No more cooking! Hurry up! ; )

  • Soylent green!

    Kip Larsen
  • Just as I am against GMO’s I am equally against 3D printing of the food I consume. A little Willy Wonka of us don’t you think.


Write a comment

Comment are moderated